Abstract
The author provides an update on the current continuing medical education (CME) cycle, which began on January 1, 2013, and will end on December 31, 2015. The author also details the changes to the CME guide for osteopathic physicians, the requirements for Category 1 CME sponsors accredited by the American
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
The objective of this study was to conduct a comprehensive formative assessment of chronic pain management in a large, multisite community health centre and use the results to design a quality improvement initiative based on an evidence-based practice model developed by the Veterans Health Administration. Improving quality and safety by
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to determine the perceptions by physicians of an educational system integrated into an electronic health record (EHR). Traditional approaches to continuous medical education (CME) have not shown improvement in patient health care outcomes. Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires (HIBA) has implemented a system that
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Feedback is essential for improving the skills of continuing medical education (CME) presenters. However, there has been little research on improving the quality of feedback to CME presenters.
OBJECTIVES:
To validate an instrument for generating balanced and behavior-specific feedback from a national cross-section of participants to presenters at a large internal medicine
Physicians and other healthcare providers are mandated to complete anywhere from 12 to 50 hours of continuing medical education (CME) yearly. The problem is that few clinicians know whether those hours of education have a meaningful impact on real-world patient outcomes. In other words, does learning a new diagnostic strategy
Abstract
INTRODUCTION:
The need for up-to-date and high-quality continuing medical education (CME) is growing while the financial investment in CME is shrinking. Despite online technology's potential to efficiently deliver electronic CME (eCME) to large numbers of users, it has not yet displaced traditional CME. The purpose of this study was to explore
Abstract
Competence and skills in overcoming clinical inertia for diabetes treatment, and actually supporting and assisting the patient through adherence and compliance (as opposed to just reiterating what they "should" be doing and then assigning them the blame if they fail) is a key component to success in addressing diabetes, and
I have been a big fan of BJ Fogg for going on two years now since I first met him at a conference at Stanford in the summer of 2011. In my opinion, Dr. Fogg's work on behavior change has the ability to significantly impact much of what we know about
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Feedback is essential for improving the skills of continuing medical education (CME) presenters. However, there has been little research on improving the quality of feedback to CME presenters.
OBJECTIVES:
To validate an instrument for generating balanced and behavior-specific feedback from a national cross-section of participants to presenters at a large internal medicine
Abstract
OBJECTIVES:
To develop and validate a new instrument for measuring participant reflection on continuing medical education (CME) and determine associations between the reflection instrument scores and CME presenter, participant, and presentation characteristics.
PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS:
This was a prospective validation study of presenters and faculty at the weekly medical grand rounds at Mayo
Ken Getz joins Kelly Ritch, EVP of Product and Clinical Research Solutions at ArcheMedX, to discuss the growing complexity in clinical trial protocols. The Director of the Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development and a Research Professor at the Tufts University School of Medicine, Ken shares his insights
Paul Evans of Velocity Clinical Research talks with Kelly Ritch, EVP of Product and Clinical Research Solutions, to discuss best practices for sites making the shift toward decentralized trials.
Paul shares how his own organization was able to pivot so quickly when the pandemic hit, why it’s too early to
Mindset Matters
Mindset is often overlooked during trial planning, but it plays a critical role in how teams perform—especially under pressure. These articles explore how behavioral science can help trial sponsors and CROs improve study delivery by shaping how teams and sites think, learn, and act.
Recent Blog Posts
Clinical Research Blog
Recent Interviews
ArcheMedX Learning Resources
Outcomes/Measurement | Learning Science | CME Profession | Behavioral Science | Cognitive Psychology
Cognitive Psychology
Learning Resources Home
ArcheMedX Learning Resources
Outcomes/Measurement | Learning Science | CME Profession | Behavioral Science | Cognitive Psychology
CME Profession
Learning Resources Home
ArcheMedX Learning Resources
Outcomes/Measurement | Learning Science | CME Profession | Behavioral Science | Cognitive Psychology
Outcomes/Measurement
Learning Resources Home
ArcheMedX Learning Resources
Outcomes/Measurement | Learning Science | CME Profession | Behavioral Science | Cognitive Psychology
Behavioral Science
Learning Resources Home
ArcheMedX Learning Resources
Outcomes/Measurement | Learning Science | CME Profession | Behavioral Science | Cognitive Psychology
Learning Science
Learning Resources Home
ArcheMedX Learning Resources
Outcomes/Measurement | Learning Science | CME Profession | Behavioral Science | Cognitive Psychology
Latest Resources
Predict and improve clinical trialsite and team performance.Accelerate timelines, mitigate risk, and reduce burden
Request a Demo
https://vimeo.com/470196148
Introducing Ready
A Smarter Way to
Accelerate Enrollment and Minimize Risks
Ready by ArcheMedX transforms study startup to prevent issues downstream by delivering better training that predicts and improves site and study team performance.
Ready streamlines site
