MENUCLOSE

 

Connect with us

Author: Brian S McGowan, PhD

RESOURCE: Decision support model for introduction of gamification solution using AHP.

Gamification means the use of various elements of game design in nongame contexts including workplace collaboration, marketing, education, military, and medical services. Gamification is effective for both improving workplace productivity and motivating employees. However, introduction of gamification is not easy because the planning and implementation processes of gamification are very complicated and it needs interdisciplinary knowledge such as information systems, organization behavior, and human psychology. Providing a systematic decision making method for gamification process is the purpose of this paper. This paper suggests the decision criteria for selection of gamification platform to support a systematic decision making process for managements. The criteria are derived from previous works on gamification, introduction of information systems, and analytic hierarchy process. The weights of decision criteria are calculated through a survey by the professionals on game, information systems, and business administration. The analytic hierarchy process is used to derive the weights. The decision criteria and weights provided in this paper could support the managements to make a systematic decision for selection of gamification platform.

via Decision support model for introducti… [ScientificWorldJournal. 2014] – PubMed – NCBI.

RESOURCE: The Hidden Curriculum of the Medical Care for Elderly Patients in Medical Education: A Qualitative Study

In spite of more attention being given to geriatrics in medical curricula, few new physicians are seeking training in this field. So far there has been no exploration of factors in the hidden curriculum that could potentially influence the persisting lack of interest in this field of medicine. To study this hidden curriculum in medical education in relation to medical care of elderly patients we used a qualitative research design including participant observations on two internal medicine wards in a teaching hospital and semi-structured interviews. The results showed that elderly patients with multiple problems are seen as frustrating and not interesting. Medical students were not stimulated to go into the totality of medical problems of elderly patients. They picked up a lot of disparaging remarks about these patients. The mainly negative attitudes demonstrated by role models, in particular the residents, may potentially influence the development of future doctors and their choice of career.

via The Hidden Curriculum of the Medical C… [Gerontol Geriatr Educ. 2014] – PubMed – NCBI.

RESOURCE: Investigating the use of quick response codes in the gross anatomy laboratory.

The use of quick response QR codes within undergraduate university courses is on the rise, yet literature concerning their use in medical education is scant. This study examined student perceptions on the usefulness of QR codes as learning aids in a medical gross anatomy course, statistically analyzed whether this learning aid impacted student performance, and evaluated whether performance could be explained by the frequency of QR code usage. Question prompts and QR codes tagged on cadaveric specimens and models were available for four weeks as learning aids to medical n = 155 and doctor of physical therapy n = 39 students. Each QR code provided answers to posed questions in the form of embedded text or hyperlinked web pages. Students’ perceptions were gathered using a formative questionnaire and practical examination scores were used to assess potential gains in student achievement. Overall, students responded positively to the use of QR codes in the gross anatomy laboratory as 89% 57/64 agreed the codes augmented their learning of anatomy. The users’ most noticeable objection to using QR codes was the reluctance to bring their smartphones into the gross anatomy laboratory. A comparison between the performance of QR code users and non-users was found to be nonsignificant P = 0.113, and no significant gains in performance P = 0.302 were observed after the intervention. Learners welcomed the implementation of QR code technology in the gross anatomy laboratory, yet this intervention had no apparent effect on practical examination performance.

via Investigating the use of quick response codes … [Anat Sci Educ. 2014] – PubMed – NCBI.

RESOURCE: What Do Professional Learning Communities (PLCs) Look Like?

PLC (Professional Learning Community) is a group of educators, stakeholders, community members and administrators who come together to analyze and improve their practices. Usually, such groups meet regularly over a period of time and discuss various things of common interest.

Professional Learning Communities can be at the school, district and national level and the members of the community are determined by its focus. For example-a group of science teachers can work in collaboration to adopt and implement programs in the best ways that help students learn science and develop 21st century skills simultaneously. Or administrators and teachers meet in professional learning community to learn and share best teaching and leading strategies including the use of technology. In PLCs, school heads and decision makers can talk and discuss on the effective ways to handle challenges and overcome problems in their role. The purpose and aim of the PLC and several gatherings may be any:

  • Annual Meeting of the community members
  • Showcase of member initiatives and best practices around 21st century education
  • Face-to-face networking with leaders and educators from across the country
  • Refinement of the content, tools, initiatives and future priorities through member collaboration.

via What Do Professional Learning Communities (PLCs) Look Like? – EdTechReview™ (ETR).

ABSTRACT: Building an open academic environment – a new approach to empowering students in their learning of anatomy through ‘Shadow Modules’.

Teaching and learning in anatomy is undertaken by a variety of methodologies, yet all of these pedagogies benefit from students discussing and reflecting upon their learning activities. An approach of particular potency is peer-mediated learning, through either peer-teaching or collaborative peer-learning. Collaborative, peer-mediated, learning activities help promote deep learning approaches and foster communities of practice in learning. Students generally flourish in collaborative learning settings but there are limitations to the benefits of collaborative learning undertaken solely within the confines of modular curricula. We describe the development of peer-mediated learning through student-focused and student-led study groups we have termed ‘Shadow Modules’. The ‘Shadow Module’ takes place parallel to the formal academically taught module and facilitates collaboration between students to support their learning for that module. In ‘Shadow Module’ activities, students collaborate towards curating existing online open resources as well as developing learning resources of their own to support their study. Through the use of communication technologies and Web 2.0 tools these resources are able to be shared with their peers, thus enhancing the learning experience of all students following the module. The Shadow Module activities have the potential to lead to participants feeling a greater sense of engagement with the subject material, as well as improving their study and group-working skills and developing digital literacy. The outputs from Shadow Module collaborative work are open-source and may be utilised by subsequent student cohorts, thus building up a repository of learning resources designed by and for students. Shadow Module activities would benefit all pedagogies in the study of anatomy, and support students moving from being passive consumers to active participants in learning.

via Building an open academic environment – a new approac… [J Anat. 2014] – PubMed – NCBI.

Physician Leadership Forum – Continuing Medical Education as a Strategic Resource

With input from AHA members, the Physician Leadership Forum examined the value of CME to hospitals as a strategic resource for physician-hospital alignment. “Continuing Medical Education as a Strategic Resource” provides an assessment of the value of CME, recommends ways to improve value, and identifies case examples of hospitals that are using CME to improve performance and align the delivery system.The report recommends greater use of performance-based CME, more streamlined accreditation standards, broader sharing of best practices, increased communication between CME departments and senior leadership, and greater involvement of physician leaders as champions in CME as ways to improve the use of CME as a strategic resource for hospitals.

via Physician Leadership Forum – Continuing Medical Education as a Strategic Resource.

Metacognition, ‘nudges’, and adult education

It appears nearly universally accepted that adult education is quite different than child and adolescent education. Adult learners are more aware, they operate from a broader base of experience, and they demand that their energies be invested in relevant content that connects back to individual needs. In a way these principles of adult learning could be boiled down to the belief that adult learning is a largely metacognitive activity.cognition in action

“Metacognition: literally means cognition about cognition, or more informally, thinking about thinking. [it has been] defined as knowledge about cognition and control of cognition. For example, I am engaging in metacognition if I notice that I am having more trouble learning A than B; [or] if it strikes me that I should double check C before accepting it as fact.”

Thus the idea of metacognition, or the foundation of adult learning theory, suggests that there are structural boundaries in which new learning can exist…and that education operating outside of these boundaries is largely ineffective and inefficient. This may be the most critical lesson an adult educator can ever learn!

That being said, there are other connections between metacognition and adult education that are equally critical and increasingly practical. For example, we at ArcheMedX have spent nearly two years pioneering the Learning Actions Model. This is an educational framework that deconstructs the process of learning and provides both adult learners and educators with an e-learning architecture that centralizes and simplifies the natural learning actions.

The origins of the Learning Actions Model lie in the complexity of adult learning and the reality that learning behaviors are rarely evolved – while most HCPs, early in their careers, devise individual systems of studying for a test, few HCPs devise a system for lifelong learning. It might help to reflect on this statement: the actions one takes to consume and memorize content for a short-term goal (a test) are not necessarily the same actions required to support higher level learning that leads to changes in attitudes, skills, or behaviors. What we have come to understand through our field research, and have subsequently validated in educational programs powered by ArcheMedX, is that adult learners benefit from uniquely structured learning experiences that simplify real lifelong learning….

For example, when a lecturer or facilitator introduces a new clinical practice guideline or new clinical best practice an adult learner will begin to relate these advances to their own practice and patient population – this is a classical Knowlesian moment. But does this mean that a learner will inherently process this information to form a new insight or that they will structure this new information such that it becomes a long-term memory or drives a new skill or behavior? No – the recognition or seed of a new insight does not in-and-of-itself lead to learning. Instead, learning is only achieved if the learner can organize this learning moment through a structured process of notes, reminders, search, and learning triggers. And this is where metacognition, nudges, and adult learning collide. Control of cognition is a shared responsibility, shared between the learner and the guide (the educator).

To be certain, we are not alone in this vision of newly structured model of life-long learning, in fact the premise has recently gained significant traction within the community of higher education.

“The softening and opening up of [education] are part of this soft paternalistic family of subtle behavior modification strategies. The learner enmeshed in digitally mediated networks is forever being nudged from afar rather than instructed; subtly tutored instead of lectured; her behaviour itself mediated through coded webs of affiliations, affinities, and associations rather than restricted through regulatory powers or directed through didactic techniques. We are seeing the emergence of a much less coercive education environment, based on emerging ideas about how we behave as we do when we are situated in dynamic, networked, open environments, and the programmed techniques of persuasion which script our interactions in such environments.”

In other words, the learning environment must play an equal part in the learning experience. And therefore structured content, connected to ones natural learning actions, and guided by the educator as they “nudge” the learner to reflect and take action, create the most effective and most efficient opportunity for learning and change. This structured approach to learning is best represented in the Learning Actions Model depicted below.

LAM_W

The truly transformative benefit to this new model of structured and guided learning is the ability to personalize and continuously refine the learning experience over time. When an educator embraces the obligation to scaffold the adult learning experience, they begin to uncover vast new information and insights into the effectiveness of the education they are providing and how learning is actually taking place. By ensuring that adult learners are leveraging effective learning actions, the actions themselves present to the educator new ways of understanding cognition, which in turn enables the educator to personalize and refine the learning experience.

Although I am naturally inclined to advocate on behalf of the Learning Actions Model, having seen its transformational impact on education powered by ArcheMedX, these ideas have been discussed elsewhere with great eloquence and perspective.

“When students use software as part of the learning process, whether in online or blended courses or doing their own research, they generate massive amounts of data. Scholars are running large-scale experiments using this data to improve teaching; to help students stay motivated and succeed in college; and even to learn more about the brain and the process of learning itself.”

Our challenge within the community of healthcare professional continuing education is to remain open to these new frameworks for learning and analytics, while ensuring that the learners themselves find the comfort and familiarity with the learning environment and content – without comfort, there is likely to be little learning. But this doesn’t negate our community’s responsibility to evolve lifelong learning in the healthcare professions. We must ensure that time invested in learning is efficiently spent and that learning itself is effective.  It is our belief that the learning actions model is a key to this evolution and provides the community with the requisite tools and insights to improve online learning, to improve retention, and to drive the critical behavior change that will improve patient-centric care.

Continue Reading

What are the limitations of self-directed learning?

As a bit of background, the ‘Zones of Proximal Development’ is a concept introduced by Vygotsky in the early 20th century. In laymens terms the model might be best understand in the following way: The zones of proximal development describe the difference between what a learner can do without help and what he or she can do only with help. In other words, “The [model] defines functions that have not matured yet, but are in a process of maturing, that which may mature tomorrow, and that which are currently in an embryonic state; these functions could be called the buds of development, the flowers of development, rather than the fruits of development, that is, what is only just maturing.”

As adult educators it is our obligation to understand these zones as a critical element of our needs assessments AND to understand and design interventions that support the transitions through each zone. While we often explore what our learners know and what they don’t know (ie., educational gaps or needs), it seems rare to see educational groups exploring how to best help learners evolve. Applying the zones of proximal development model would mean that our needs assessments and educational planning process increasingly focus on how to move learners forward from one zone, to another, to another – while understanding what structure is required to support the learning process.Zones of proximal development

At ArcheMedX, using the Natural Learning Actions model, we have developed a structured learning model that allows learners to move through content (and across zones) in both self-paced and scaffolded ways. The primary learning objects created by partners provide the principal learning experiences, but it is the sophistication afforded by the learning architecture that allows educators to create trigger points through Educator Notes, Cuepoints, and In-Lesson Polling that extend an educator’s reach and contribute to a fully scaffolded learning experience. While many learners may be able to consume the primary learning object with little additional support, many more (it seems) require the layered and connected learning experience to truly engage and learn. And this is perhaps one of the most critical insights we have derived from the thousands of learners who have completed ArcheMedX-powered education and engaged around content to more effectively reflect and apply critical lessons to practice.

Perhaps our call to action here is to ensure that the educational community expands their definition of good educational planning and design as they realize that the creation of content is simply the first step in the educators role. To ensure success they must focus more broadly on creating a complete and structured learning experience. Considering the zones of proximal development model should drive educators to seek out and leverage more structured educational interventions, without which the limitations of learning and self-directed learner growth may be undermining the overall impact of the medical education we create.

RESOURCE: Flipped Classroom 2.0: Competency Learning With Videos

e flipped classroom model generated a lot of excitement initially, but more recently some educators — even those who were initial advocates — have expressed disillusionment with the idea of assigning students to watch instructional videos at home and work on problem solving and practice in class. Biggest criticisms: watching videos of lectures wasn’t all that revolutionary, that it perpetuated bad teaching and raised questions about equal access to digital technology.Now flipped classroom may have reached equilibrium, neither loved nor hated, just another potential tool for teachers — if done well. “You never want to get stuck in a rut and keep doing the same thing over and over,” said Aaron Sams, a former high school chemistry teacher turned consultant who helped pioneer flipped classroom learning in an edWeb webinar. “The flipped classroom is not about the video,” said Jonathan Bergmann, Sams’ fellow teacher who helped fine tune and improve a flipped classroom strategy. “It’s about the active engaged stuff you can do in your class.”

via Flipped Classroom 2.0: Competency Learning With Videos | MindShift.

ABSTRACT: Trainee and Program Director Perceptions of Quality Improvement and Patient Safety Education

Objective. To assess the current state of quality improvement and patient safety (QIPS) education at a large teaching hospital. Methods. We surveyed 429 trainees (138 residents, 291 clinical fellows) and 38 program directors (PDs; 2 were PDs of >1 program) from 39 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited training programs. Results. Twenty-nine PDs (76.3%) and 259 trainees (60.3%) responded. Most trainees (68.8%) reported participation in projects culminating in scholarly products (39.9%) or clinical innovations (44%). Most PDs reported that teaching (88.9%) and project supervision (83.3%) are performed by expert faculty. Nearly half of the PDs (45.8%) and trainees (49.6%) perceived project-based learning to be of equal value to formal curricula. Compared with trainees, a greater proportion of PDs reported needs for funding for projects, teaching faculty to provide mentorship, and faculty development (P < .05). Conclusions. Providing additional financial, administrative, and operational support could enhance the value of curricula and projects. Developing expert teaching faculty is paramount.

via Trainee and Program Director Perception… [Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2014] – PubMed – NCBI.