REQUEST DEMO
MENUCLOSE

 

REQUEST DEMO
Clinical Operations
Commercial Teams
Resources
Medical Education
About Us
Connect with us
Facebook-f Twitter Linkedin-in
Sign in

Author: Brian S McGowan, PhD

ABSTRACT: Complex cases in primary care: report of a CME-certified series addressing patients with multiple comorbidities

AIM:
To assess whether participation in a series of continuing medical education-certified activities presenting complicated case scenarios resulted in evidence-based decision making for patients with chronic comorbid conditions.
METHODS:
A series of interactive live workshops and online case studies presented evidence-based, practical information addressing the care of patients with multiple chronic diseases to primary care physicians. Clinical case vignettes were used to assess workshop participant knowledge and competence. Results were compared with those of matched non-participant controls. Online participants were surveyed to evaluate immediate knowledge gains from the activity.
RESULTS:
Overall, physician workshop participants were 27% more knowledgeable of evidence-based treatment decisions. Participants were more likely to refer a patient with rheumatoid arthritis to a rheumatologist (57% vs. 36%; p = 0.035) and showed better recognition of medications that can contribute to overactive bladder symptoms (36% vs. 18%; p = 0.043) compared with non-participant controls. Non-significant differences in favour of participants included evidence-based decisions regarding the management of osteoporosis, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in adults and type 2 diabetes mellitus in adolescents. Online participants demonstrated significant knowledge gains (p < 0.001) on 17 of 18 assessment questions across all therapeutic areas.
DISCUSSION:
Chronic comorbid conditions afflict a sizable minority of patients. However, specific recommendations and education surrounding patient management are often overlooked because of the inherent difficulty of treating this group. Highly interactive educational activities can improve participant knowledge and competency in treating these patients by providing an opportunity to interact with faculty experts, receive immediate feedback and practice new skills.
CONCLUSION:
Interactive educational activities that discuss complicated case scenarios can improve participant application of evidence-based medicine for patients with multiple chronic comorbidities.

via Complex cases in primary care: report of a … [Int J Clin Pract. 2013] – PubMed – NCBI.

Continue Reading

ABSTRACT: A Community-based Collaborative Approach to Improve Breast Cancer Screening in Underserved African American Women

Although African American women in the United States have a lower incidence of breast cancer compared with white women, those younger than 40 years actually have a higher incidence rate; additionally, African American women are more likely to die from breast cancer at every age compared with white women. Racial disparities in breast cancer mortality rates are especially significant in Maryland, which ranks fifth in the nation for breast cancer mortality, and in Baltimore City, which has the second highest annual death rate for African American women in Maryland. To address this disparity in care, Med-IQ, an accredited provider of CME, collaborated with Sisters Network Baltimore Metropolitan, Affiliate Chapter of Sisters Network® Inc., the only national African American breast cancer survivorship organization, to sponsor their community-based educational outreach initiative. The collaborative mission was to engage at-risk African American women, their families, local organizations, healthcare professionals, and clinics, with the goals of increasing awareness, addressing fears that affect timely care and diagnosis, and encouraging women to obtain regular mammograms. Intervention strategies included (1) a “Survivor Stories” video, (2) patient outreach consisting of neighborhood walks and an educational luncheon, and (3) a community outreach utilizing direct mailings to local businesses, community groups, and healthcare professionals. Trusted and well-known community resources were presented as mediums to promote the initiative, yielding achievement of broader and more effective outcomes. As a result of this patient-friendly initiative, two (2) of the women who sought screening were diagnosed with breast cancer and underwent treatment.

via A Community-based Collaborative Approach to Im… [J Cancer Educ. 2014] – PubMed – NCBI.

Continue Reading

ABSTRACT: Engaging Residents and Fellows to Improve Institution-Wide Quality: The First Six Years of a Novel Financial Incentive Program.

PURPOSE:
Teaching hospitals strive to engage physicians in quality improvement (QI), and graduate medical education (GME) programs must promote trainee competence in systems-based practice (SBP). The authors developed a QI incentive program that engages residents and fellows, providing them with financial incentives to improve quality while simultaneously gaining SBP experience. In this study, they describe and evaluate success in meeting goals set during the program’s first six years.
METHOD:
During fiscal years (FYs) 2007-2012, QI project goals for all or specific training programs were set collaboratively with residents and fellows at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF). Data were collected from administrative databases, via chart abstraction, or through independently designed techniques.
RESULTS:
Approximately 5,275 residents and fellows were eligible and participated in the program. A total of 55 projects were completed. Among the 18 all-program projects, goals were achieved for 11 (61%) in three domains: patient satisfaction, quality/safety, and operation/utilization. Among the 37 program-specific projects, goals were achieved for 28 (76%) in four categories: patient-level interventions, enhanced communication, workflow improvements, and effective documentation. Residents and fellows earned an average of $800 in bonuses/FY for achieving these goals.
CONCLUSIONS:
Thousands of residents and fellows across disciplines participated in real-life, real-time QI during the program’s first six years. Participation provided an experience that may promote SBP competence and resulted in improved quality of care across the UCSF Medical Center. Similar programs may assist teaching hospitals and GME programs in meeting current and future QI and training mandates.

via Engaging Residents and Fellows to Improve Instituti… [Acad Med. 2014] – PubMed – NCBI.

Continue Reading

ABSTRACT: What Skills Should New Internal Medicine Interns Have in July? A National Survey of Internal Medicine Residency Program Directors.

PROBLEM:
The transition from medical student to intern may cause stress and burnout in new interns and the delivery of suboptimal patient care. Despite a formal set of subinternship curriculum guidelines, program directors have expressed concern regarding the skill set of new interns and the lack of standardization in that skill set among interns from different medical schools. To address these issues, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education’s Next Accreditation System focuses on the development of a competency-based education continuum spanning undergraduate, graduate, and continuing medical education.
APPROACH:
In 2010, the Clerkship Directors in Internal Medicine subinternship task force, in collaboration with the Association of Program Directors in Internal Medicine survey committee, surveyed internal medicine residency program directors to determine which competencies or skills they expected from new medical school graduates. The authors summarized the results using categories of interest.
OUTCOMES:
In both an item rank list and free-text responses, program directors were nearly uniform in ranking the skills they deemed most important for new interns-organization and time management and prioritization skills; effective communication skills; basic clinical skills; and knowing when to ask for assistance.
NEXT STEPS:
Stakeholders should use the results of this survey as they develop a milestone-based curriculum for the fourth year of medical school and for the internal medicine subinternship. By doing so, they should develop a standardized set of skills that meet program directors’ expectations, reduce the stress of transitions across the educational continuum, and improve the quality of patient care.

via What Skills Should New Internal Medicine Interns Ha… [Acad Med. 2014] – PubMed – NCBI.

Continue Reading

ABSTRACT: Teaching the Physical Examination: A Longitudinal Strategy for Tomorrow’s Physicians

The physical examination is an essential clinical skill. The traditional approach to teaching the physical exam has involved a comprehensive “head-to-toe” checklist, which is often used to assess students before they begin their clinical clerkships. This method has been criticized for its lack of clinical context and for promoting rote memorization without critical thinking. In response to these concerns, Gowda and colleagues surveyed a national sample of clinical skills educators in order to develop a consensus “core” physical exam, which they report in this issue. The core physical exam is intended to be performed for every patient admitted by students during their medicine clerkships and to be supplemented by symptom-driven “clusters” of additional history and physical exam maneuvers.In this commentary, the authors review the strengths and limitations of this Core + Clusters technique as well as the head-to-toe approach. They propose that the head-to-toe still has a place in medical education, particularly for beginning students with little knowledge of pathophysiology and for patients with vague or multiple symptoms. The authors suggest that the ideal curriculum would include teaching both the head-to-toe and the Core + Clusters exams in sequence. This iterative approach to physical exam teaching would allow a student to assess a patient in a comprehensive manner while incorporating more clinical reasoning as further medical knowledge is acquired.

via Teaching the Physical Examination: A Longitudinal S… [Acad Med. 2014] – PubMed – NCBI.

Continue Reading

ASTRACT: Key considerations for the success of Medical Education Research and Innovation units in Canada

Growth in the field of medical education is evidenced by the proliferation of units dedicated to advancing Medical Education Research and Innovation (MERI). While a review of the literature discovered narrative accounts of MERI unit development, we found no systematic examinations of the dimensions of and structures that facilitate the success of these units. We conducted qualitative interviews with the directors of 12 MERI units across Canada. Data were analyzed using qualitative description (Sandelowski in Res Nurs Health 23:334-340, 2000). Final analysis drew on Bourdieu’s (Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1977; Media, culture and society: a critical reader. Sage, London, 1986; Language and symbolic power. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1991) concepts of field, habitus, and capital, and more recent research investigating the field of MERI (Albert in Acad Med 79:948-954, 2004; Albert et al. in Adv Health Sci Educ 12:103-115, 2007). When asked about the metrics by which they define their success, directors cited: teaching, faculty mentoring, building collaborations, delivering conference presentations, winning grant funding, and disseminating publications. Analyzed using Bourdieu’s concepts, these metrics are discussed as forms of capital that have been legitimized in the MERI field. All directors, with the exception of one, described success as being comprised of elements (capital) at both ends of the service-research spectrum (i.e., Albert’s PP-PU structure). Our analysis highlights the forms of habitus (i.e., behaviors, attitudes, demeanors) directors use to negotiate, strategize and position the unit within their local context. These findings may assist institutions in developing a new-or reorganizing an existing-MERI unit. We posit that a better understanding of these complex social structures can help units become savvy participants in the MERI field. With such insight, units can improve their academic output and their status in the MERI context-locally, nationally, and internationally.

via Key considerations for the … [Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2014] – PubMed – NCBI.

Continue Reading

ABSTRACT: Paperwork versus patient care: a nationwide survey of residents’ perceptions of clinical documentation requirements and patient care.

BACKGROUND:
The current health care system requires a substantial amount of documentation by physicians, potentially limiting time spent on patient care.
OBJECTIVE:
We sought to explore trainees’ perceptions of their clinical documentation requirements and the relationship between time spent on clinical documentation versus time available for patient care.
METHODS:
An anonymous, online survey was sent to trainees in all postgraduate years of training and specialties in Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited programs.
RESULTS:
Over a 2-month time frame, 1515 trainees in 24 specialties completed the survey. Most (92%) reported that documentation obligations are excessive, that time spent with patients has been compromised by this (90%), and that the amount of clinical documentation has had a negative effect on patient care (73%). Most residents and fellows reported feeling rushed and frustrated because of these documentation demands. They also reported that time spent on these tasks decreased their time available for teaching others and reduced the quality of their education. Respondents reported spending more time on clinical documentation than on direct patient care (P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS:
Trainees’ current clinical documentation workload may be a barrier to optimal patient care and to resident and fellow education. Residents and fellows report that clinical documentation duties are onerous, and there is a perceived negative effect on time spent with patients, overall quality of patient care, physician well-being, time available for teaching, and quality of resident education.

via Paperwork versus patient care: a nationwide … [J Grad Med Educ. 2013] – PubMed – NCBI.

Continue Reading

ABSTRACT: Recertification: what do specialists think about skill assessment?

BACKGROUND:
Continuing medical education and objective performance assessment remain the key components of recertification. Objective skills assessment in routine practice remains challenging due to extensive variations in case selection and treatments. This study explores expert opinions regarding objective skills assessment for specialists within the framework of recertification.
METHODS:
We used a qualitative, semi-structured interview-based approach to obtain information and suggestions about key issues and recommendations relating to specialists’ skills assessment. Twenty-two face-to-face interviews were conducted. Interviews were transcribed and analysed by two reviewers.
RESULTS:
The information from the interviews was categorized under the headings of: (1) the components of specialist-level skills, (2) the methods for assessing specialist skills, (3) the types of tools and procedures used during observational assessment, (4) the unsuccessful specialists, and (5) the selection and training of assessors for specialist assessment.
CONCLUSIONS:
Outcome-based assessment of performance followed by observation of practice, were recommended as effective modes of evaluation of performance.

via Recertification: what do specialists think about ski… [Surgeon. 2013] – PubMed – NCBI.

Continue Reading

ABSTRACT: The long-term impact of a performance improvement continuing medical education intervention on osteoporosis screening.

INTRODUCTION:
The purpose of this study is to determine whether a performance improvement continuing medical education (PI CME) initiative that utilizes quality improvement (QI) principles is effective in producing sustainable change in practice to improve the screening of patients at risk for osteoporosis.
METHODOLOGY:
A health care center participated in a PI CME program designed to increase appropriate osteoporosis screening. There were eight 1-hour educational sessions for this activity over a 9-month period. Thirteen providers completed all 3 stages of the PI CME program. A variety of other clinicians, in addition to the 13 providers, participated in the educational sessions. Data were collected at the beginning and end of the PI CME activity and at three intervals during the 5 years after the completion of the activity.
RESULTS:
The percentage of tests for osteoporosis ordered and performed increased significantly from Stage A to Stage C of the PI CME activity and continued to increase after the completion of the PI CME activity. Follow-up data at 4 and 40 months (for ordering and performing osteoporosis screening) and 49 months (for performing the screening only) reflect the impact of the PI CME activity plus the continuing QI interventions. The percentage of BMD tests ordered continued to increase substantially over the post-PI CME periods: 4 and 40 months (F(3,46) = 4.04, p < .05). Similarly, the percentage of BMD tests performed continued to increase at 4, 40, and 49 months after the conclusion of the PI CME activity (F(4,55) = 12.55, p < .0001).
DISCUSSION:
The data indicate that PI CME utilizing QI principles can be effective in producing sustainable change in practice to improve the screening of patients at risk for osteoporosis. Further research is needed to determine the extent to which such changes can be directly attributed to this type of intervention.

via The long-term impact of a performa… [J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2013] – PubMed – NCBI.

Continue Reading

ABSTRACT: Enhancing quality improvements in cancer care through CME activities at a nationally recognized cancer center

Changing healthcare policy will undoubtedly affect the healthcare environment in which providers function. The current Fee for Service reimbursement model will be replaced by Value-Based Purchasing, where higher quality and more efficient care will be emphasized. Because of this, large healthcare organizations and individual providers must adapt to incorporate performance outcomes into patient care. Here, we present a Continuing Medical Education (CME)-based initiative at the City of Hope National Cancer Center that we believe can serve as a model for using CME as a value added component to achieving such a goal.

via Enhancing quality improvements in cancer care … [J Cancer Educ. 2013] – PubMed – NCBI.

Continue Reading
Social
Facebook-f Twitter Linkedin-in
Recent News
Contact Us

300 E Main Street, Suite 101 Charlottesville, VA 22902

+1-434-260-1850

Email Us

About Us

ArcheMedX helps life sciences and healthcare organizations to better equip, evaluate, and predict team and clinician performance

ArcheMedX Privacy Policy