MENUCLOSE

 

Connect with us

Author: Brian S McGowan, PhD

ABSTRACT: Elearning approaches to prevent weight gain in young adults: A randomized controlled study

OBJECTIVE:Preventing obesity among young adults should be a preferred public health approach given the limited efficacy of treatment interventions. This study examined whether weight gain can be prevented by online approaches using two different behavioral models, one overtly directed at obesity and the other covertly.METHODS:A three-group parallel randomized controlled intervention was conducted in 2012-2013; 20,975 young adults were allocated a priori to one control and two “treatment” groups. Two treatment groups were offered online courses over 19 weeks on (1) personal weight control (“Not the Ice Cream Van,” NTICV) and, (2) political, environmental, and social issues around food (“Goddess Demetra,” “GD”). Control group received no contact. The primary outcome was weight change over 40 weeks.RESULTS:Within-group 40-week weight changes were different between groups (P < 0.001): Control (n = 2,134): +2.0 kg (95% CI = 1.5, 2.3 kg); NTICV (n = 1,810): -1.0 kg (95% CI = -1.3, -0.5); and GD (n = 2,057): -1.35 kg (95% CI = -1.4 to -0.7). Relative risks for weight gain vs.CONTROL:NTICV = 0.13 kg (95% CI = 0.10, 0.15), P < 0.0001; GD = 0.07 kg (95% CI = 0.05, 0.10), P < 0.0001.

CONCLUSIONS:Both interventions were associated with prevention of the weight gain observed among control subjects. This low-cost intervention could be widely transferable as one tool against the obesity epidemic. Outside the randomized controlled trial setting, it could be enhanced using supporting advertising and social media.

via Elearning approaches to prevent weight gain in young adults: A randomized controlled study. – PubMed – NCBI.

The “Golden Rules” of Truly Purposeful Educational Design (and how to embrace them!)

Looking back at nearly a decade of training as an academic research scientist, I have come to hold one truth above all else: the most important lesson a scientist learns is how to approach one’s curiosity in a structured way – asking questions and challenging common understanding is essential to growing as a scientist – but you must be methodical in how you go about your exploration. This is how careers are made, how science evolves, and how real breakthroughs emerge.

Having spent the past fifteen years studying medical education, I’d argue that being an educator is no different: the “Golden Rule” and most important lesson an educator learns is how to approach one’s design and planning in a structured way – asking questions and challenging common approaches is essential to growing as an educator – but you must be organized and methodical in how you go about your work.

Ask questions, be methodical

There are two critical elements baked within the “Golden Rule” – 1) asking question/challenging common approaches means that an educator should never accept that the status quo is the optimal approach (or even acceptable) and 2) being methodical about what should/could change and what results from the planned changes is the best path towards success.shutterstock_317617661_golden rules_small

Understanding how to look beyond the status quo is no simple matter, experience suggests that not everyone is comfortable asking tough questions, challenging conventional wisdom, or changing established processes; and not every workplace or culture empowers such questions or curiosity. This is a challenge that I will try to tackle in a separate post – for now let’s assume curiosity is alive and well and that your question has already been identified….now what do you do?

Stepping back a bit…

Educators are tasked with creating impact (i.e., changes in knowledge/performance, etc…) through education. In this vein, volumes have been written on how gap analyses, needs assessments, learning objectives, adult learning theory, and outcomes models are essential tools of this work – but little has been written about how these tools are most effectively and most methodically applied in practice.

To prove this point, my guess is that most educational professionals can point to books on needs assessment (Example 1), or guidelines on writing learning objectives (Example 2), or even meta-reviews on adult learning theory or outcomes models (Example 3), but few can point to examples of how these tools are applied over time.

How do you systematically approach each tool and ‘test’ whether it impacts the impact you intended?

How do you demonstrate in your educational practice/setting that you are making the optimal design choices and generating the greatest impact given all available resource?

It seems that, accepting the “Golden Rule”, what is missing from the decades of literature on educational planning, design, implementation, and assessment is the ‘methodical’ piece – how can we execute on our plans AND ensure that we are intelligently advancing the profession of medical education?

Here is my simple, yet critical suggestion: Much like an academic research scientist documents each step in the scientific method – question, intervention, conditions, data, analysis – an educational designer should meticulously document each step in their educational planning process. In short, an educational designer should commit to keeping a lab notebook!

Your Lab Notebook

As a bit of background, stored away in my basement I have more than a dozen lab notebooks much like the one pictured above, many dating back to the 1990’s. These notebooks document every experiment I ever conducted as a research scientist. The notebooks allowed me to document each step in the exploration from planning, to alignment with prior research, to step-by-step details of the interventions, to data, to analysis and conclusions – as a research scientist my lab notebooks were the scaffolding for my thoughts, my efforts, and my findings.Lab Notebooks

As an educator, I have moved on to a digital notebook – I use Evernote – that similarly documents my questions, the alignment with prior research, my interventional opportunities, any known limitations, and my data, analyses, and conclusions.

Leveraging Your Lab Notebook

By thinking about each of your educational design decisions as an opportunity to learn something new – as an experiment – and by methodically documenting these decisions within your lab notebook, you will quickly recognize how often subtle variables or decisions lead to, or undermine, the success of your interventions!

For example, at ArcheMedX we partner with dozens of academic medical centers, national medical societies, and medical education companies that use our software, learning models, and novel data to improve the educational interventions that they plan, design, and implement – each Partner and each project therefore may be seen as a separate experiment. Connecting these experiments ensures that the educational experiences that are provided to Learners from around the world are constantly improving and my lab notebook helps me connect these dots.

  • How can I demonstrate that the ArcheViewer drives greater completion rates = experiment!
  • How can I prove the effectiveness of the ArcheViewer in different audiences = experiment!
  • Can the Learning Actions Model allow for agile activity enhancements = experiment!
  • What is the optimal number/form of designed learning moments = experiment!

To be clear, it can be a challenge to identify a specific element in each project that may be ‘studied’ or documented. But when the circumstances present themselves – and when I convince our Partners that they have a unique opportunity to collect data that might address a research question – I will commit to documenting these ‘experiments’ within my notebook.

In the end, I see my lab notebook as an incredibly critical mirror that ensures that I don’t lose touch with the impact I am having or could be having on the science of medical education. And my belief is that if are willing to accept the Golden Rule, then you’ll quickly come to see the value of your lab notebook too!

Continue Reading

Mobile learning devices in the workplace: ‘as much a part of the junior doctors’ kit as a stethoscope’? | BMC Medical Education | Full Text

Background
Smartphones are ubiquitous and commonly used as a learning and information resource. They have potential to revolutionize medical education and medical practice. The iDoc project provides a medical textbook smartphone app to newly-qualified doctors working in Wales. The project was designed to assist doctors in their transition from medical school to workplace, a period associated with high levels of cognitive demand and stress.

Methods
Newly qualified doctors submitted case reports (n = 293) which detail specific instances of how the textbook app was used. Case reports were submitted via a structured online form (using Bristol Online Surveys – BOS) which gave participants headings to elicit a description of: the setting/context; the problem/issue addressed; what happened; any obstacles involved; and their reflections on the event. Case reports were categorised by the purpose of use, and by elements of the quality improvement framework (IoM 2001). They were then analysed thematically to identify challenges of use.

Results
Analysis of the case reports revealed how smartphones are a viable tool to address clinical questions and support mobile learning. They contribute to novice doctors’ provision of safe, effective, timely, efficient and patient-centred care. The case reports also revealed considerable challenges for doctors using mobile technology within the workplace. Participants reported concern that using a mobile phone in front of patients and staff might appear unprofessional.

Conclusion
Mobile phones blur boundaries between the public and private, and the personal and professional. In contrast to using a mobile as a communication device, using a smartphone as an information resource in the workplace requires different rituals. Uncertain etiquette of mobile use may reduce the capacity of smartphone technology to improve the learning experience of newly qualified doctors.

via Mobile learning devices in the workplace: ‘as much a part of the junior doctors’ kit as a stethoscope’? | BMC Medical Education | Full Text.

RESOURCE: Harvard Library publishes report on converting subscription journals to open access

The Harvard Library Office for Scholarly Communication (OSC) is pleased to announce the release of a comprehensive literature review on strategies for converting subscription journals to open access.

In the spring of 2015, the OSC commissioned the research from David Solomon, Mikael Laakso, and Bo-Christer Björk, who completed it in the spring of 2016. We posted a preliminary draft online for a four month public-comment period, and asked a distinguished panel of 20 colleagues to add their own comments.

The authors identified 15 journal-flipping scenarios: 10 that depend on article processing charges (APCs) and 5 that dispense with APCs. For each one they give examples, evidence, and their assessment of its strengths and weaknesses. The examples come from all scholarly niches by academic field, regions of the world, and economic strata.

This comprehensive review of diverse approaches is the report’s strength. Not every flip was a success, and not all the flips that were successful using one scenario would have been successful with a different scenario. But there were successes under every scenario and in every scholarly niche. Journals that picked a scenario that fit their circumstances were able preserve or enhance their readership, submissions, quality, and financial sustainability….

via Harvard Library publishes report on converting subscription journals to open access | Journal-Flipping | Harvard OSC.

MANUSCRIPT: Comparing nurses’ knowledge retention following electronic continuous education and educational booklet: a controlled trial study

BACKGROUND:
Training methods that enhance nurses’ learning and retention will increase the quality of patient care. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of electronic learning and educational booklet on the nurses’ retention of diabetes updates.
METHODS:
In this controlled trial study, convenience sampling was used to select 123 nurses from the endocrinology and internal medicine wards of three hospitals affiliated to Tehran University of Medical Sciences (Tehran, Iran). The participants were allocated to three groups of manual, electronic learning, and control. The booklet and electronic learning groups were trained using educational booklet and electronic continuous medical education (CME) website, respectively. The control group did not receive any intervention. In all the three groups, the nurses’ knowledge was measured before the intervention, and one and four weeks after the intervention. Data were collected by a questionnaire.
RESULTS:
Significant differences were observed between the mean scores of the three groups one and four weeks after the intervention (F=26.17, p=0.001 and F=4.07, p=0.020, respectively), and post hoc test showed that this difference was due to the higher score in e-learning group. Both e-learning and booklet methods could effectively improve nurses’ knowledge (χ²=23.03, p=0.001 and χ²=51.71, p=0.001, respectively).
CONCLUSION:
According to the results of this study, electronic learning was more effective than booklet in enhancing the learning and retention of knowledge. Electronic learning is suggested as a more suitable method as it provides appropriate interactions and attractive virtual environments to motivate the learners and promote retention.

via Comparing nurses’ knowledge retention following electronic continuous education and educational booklet: a controlled trial study. – PubMed – NCBI.

MANUSCRIPT: Blended learning: how can we optimise undergraduate student engagement?

BACKGROUND:
Blended learning is a combination of online and face-to-face learning and is increasingly of interest for use in undergraduate medical education. It has been used to teach clinical post-graduate students pharmacology but needs evaluation for its use in teaching pharmacology to undergraduate medical students, which represent a different group of students with different learning needs.
METHODS:
An existing BSc-level module on neuropharmacology was redesigned using the Blended Learning Design Tool (BLEnDT), a tool which uses learning domains (psychomotor, cognitive and affective) to classify learning outcomes into those taught best by self-directed learning (online) or by collaborative learning (face-to-face). Two online courses were developed, one on Neurotransmitters and the other on Neurodegenerative Conditions. These were supported with face-to-face tutorials. Undergraduate students’ engagement with blended learning was explored by the means of three focus groups, the data from which were analysed thematically.
RESULTS:
Five major themes emerged from the data 1) Purpose and Acceptability 2) Structure, Focus and Consolidation 3) Preparation and workload 4) Engagement with e-learning component 5) Future Medical Education.
CONCLUSION:
Blended learning was acceptable and of interest to undergraduate students learning this subject. They expressed a desire for more blended learning in their courses, but only if it was highly structured, of high quality and supported by tutorials. Students identified that the ‘blend’ was beneficial rather than purely online learning.

via Blended learning: how can we optimise undergraduate student engagement? – PubMed – NCBI.

MANUSCRIPT: What Are We Looking for in Computer-Based Learning Interventions in Medical Education? A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND:
Computer-based learning (CBL) has been widely used in medical education, and reports regarding its usage and effectiveness have ranged broadly. Most work has been done on the effectiveness of CBL approaches versus traditional methods, and little has been done on the comparative effects of CBL versus CBL methodologies. These findings urged other authors to recommend such studies in hopes of improving knowledge about which CBL methods work best in which settings.
OBJECTIVE:
In this systematic review, we aimed to characterize recent studies of the development of software platforms and interventions in medical education, search for common points among studies, and assess whether recommendations for CBL research are being taken into consideration.
METHODS:
We conducted a systematic review of the literature published from 2003 through 2013. We included studies written in English, specifically in medical education, regarding either the development of instructional software or interventions using instructional software, during training or practice, that reported learner attitudes, satisfaction, knowledge, skills, or software usage. We conducted 2 latent class analyses to group articles according to platform features and intervention characteristics. In addition, we analyzed references and citations for abstracted articles.
RESULTS:
We analyzed 251 articles. The number of publications rose over time, and they encompassed most medical disciplines, learning settings, and training levels, totaling 25 different platforms specifically for medical education. We uncovered 4 latent classes for educational software, characteristically making use of multimedia (115/251, 45.8%), text (64/251, 25.5%), Web conferencing (54/251, 21.5%), and instructional design principles (18/251, 7.2%). We found 3 classes for intervention outcomes: knowledge and attitudes (175/212, 82.6%), knowledge, attitudes, and skills (11.8%), and online activity (12/212, 5.7%). About a quarter of the articles (58/227, 25.6%) did not hold references or citations in common with other articles. The number of common references and citations increased in articles reporting instructional design principles (P=.03), articles measuring online activities (P=.01), and articles citing a review by Cook and colleagues on CBL (P=.04). There was an association between number of citations and studies comparing CBL versus CBL, independent of publication date (P=.02).
CONCLUSIONS:
Studies in this field vary highly, and a high number of software systems are being developed. It seems that past recommendations regarding CBL interventions are being taken into consideration. A move into a more student-centered model, a focus on implementing reusable software platforms for specific learning contexts, and the analysis of online activity to track and predict outcomes are relevant areas for future research in this field.

via What Are We Looking for in Computer-Based Learning Interventions in Medical Education? A Systematic Review. – PubMed – NCBI.

MANUSCRIPT: Web-Based Immersive Virtual Patient Simulators: Positive Effect on Clinical Reasoning in Medical Education

BACKGROUND:
Clinical reasoning is based on the declarative and procedural knowledge of workflows in clinical medicine. Educational approaches such as problem-based learning or mannequin simulators support learning of procedural knowledge. Immersive patient simulators (IPSs) go one step further as they allow an illusionary immersion into a synthetic world. Students can freely navigate an avatar through a three-dimensional environment, interact with the virtual surroundings, and treat virtual patients. By playful learning with IPS, medical workflows can be repetitively trained and internalized. As there are only a few university-driven IPS with a profound amount of medical knowledge available, we developed a university-based IPS framework. Our simulator is free to use and combines a high degree of immersion with in-depth medical content. By adding disease-specific content modules, the simulator framework can be expanded depending on the curricular demands. However, these new educational tools compete with the traditional teaching
OBJECTIVE:
It was our aim to develop an educational content module that teaches clinical and therapeutic workflows in surgical oncology. Furthermore, we wanted to examine how the use of this module affects student performance.
METHODS:
The new module was based on the declarative and procedural learning targets of the official German medical examination regulations. The module was added to our custom-made IPS named ALICE (Artificial Learning Interface for Clinical Education). ALICE was evaluated on 62 third-year students.
RESULTS:
Students showed a high degree of motivation when using the simulator as most of them had fun using it. ALICE showed positive impact on clinical reasoning as there was a significant improvement in determining the correct therapy after using the simulator. ALICE positively impacted the rise in declarative knowledge as there was improvement in answering multiple-choice questions before and after simulator use.
CONCLUSIONS:
ALICE has a positive effect on knowledge gain and raises students’ motivation. It is a suitable tool for supporting clinical education in the blended learning context.

via Web-Based Immersive Virtual Patient Simulators: Positive Effect on Clinical Reasoning in Medical Education. – PubMed – NCBI.

ABSTRACT: A collaborative strategy to improve geriatric medical education

INTRODUCTION:
Age-related demographic change is not being matched by a growth in relevant undergraduate medical education, in particular communication skills pertinent to elderly patients. To address this, a workshop for medical students focusing on important communication skills techniques for interacting with patients with dementia was designed by clinicians from the Geriatric, General Practice and Psychiatry departments at the University of Oxford.
METHODS:
One hundred and forty-four first-year clinical students (Year 4 of the 6-year course; Year 2 of the 4-year graduate-entry course) attended the teaching. One hundred and twenty-nine students returned feedback forms with 104 forms matched for individual performance before and after the session. Feedback forms assessed student-perceived confidence in communicating with patients with dementia before and after the session using a 4-point Likert scale with corresponding numerical value (low (1), medium (2), high (3), very high (4)).
RESULTS:
Using the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test on the 104 matched forms, student-perceived confidence was higher post-teaching intervention (median = 2.75) than pre-intervention (median = 1.50). This difference was statistically significant with large effect size, Z = -8.47, P < 0.001, r = -0.59. Free-text comments focused on non-verbal communication skills teaching, suggesting that these sessions were most beneficial for topics hardest to teach in lecture-based approaches.
CONCLUSION:
The teaching aimed to promote patient-centred care and multidisciplinary collaborative practice, encourage student self-reflection and peer-assisted education and provide insight into the needs of patients with dementia. Student feedback indicated that these objectives had been met. This easily replicable teaching method provides a simple means of improving communication skills.

via A collaborative strategy to improve geriatric medical education. – PubMed – NCBI.